A new chatbot... Errrrrr.... "conversational AI: contender is coming to America and the rest of the world soon. They're called Predictive Hire and they have an army of PhDs that says their tech is better than yours.
CEO Barb Hyman can explain and has no problem staring down the barrel of our Firing Squad rapid-fire questions. Does Predictive Hire come out unscathed? Are run into the guns? Ya gotta listen to find out :)
Firing Squad is powered by Pandologic's programmatic revolution!
PODCAST TRANSCRIPTION sponsored by:
pandoLogic Promo (-1h -1m -0s):
Hey HR, have you joined the programmatic revolution? If not, you're about to get schooled on how to take your organization to the next level. Check this out. 95% of CMOs use programmatic advertising, but only 5% of CHROs are using it to advertise their jobs. Where's the disconnect? PandoLogic uses powerful automation to drive higher performing job ads without the bloated budget. It's time to transform the way you think about job advertising and join the revolution. Learn more at pandologic.com/revolution
Shark Tank Intro (36s):
Like Shark Tank? Then you'll love Firing Squad! CHAD SOWASH & JOEL CHEESEMAN are here to put the recruiting industry's bravest, ballsiest, and baddest startups through the gauntlet to see if they got what it takes to make it out alive? Dig a fox hole and duck for cover kids the Chad and Cheese Podcast is taking it to a whole other level.
Joel (58s):
Yeah, the only thing standing between me and happy hour is this firing squad. What's up everybody. This is firing squad and you're listening to the Chad and Cheese podcast. I am Joel Cheeseman is always joined by my partner in crime, Chad Sowash and today our sucker is Predictive Hire. We welcome Barb Hyman from down under. She is the CEO Barb. Good day, mate.
Barb (1m 26s):
Good day.
Joel (1m 26s):
How's it going?
Barb (1m 27s):
Hi guys.
Joel (1m 29s):
So before we get into the company, tell us a little bit about you.
Barb (1m 34s):
So I'm the CEO and founder of Predictive Hire. I'm probably the least likely person to be leading this company as an AI company because I'm female, for one. And I am neither a data scientist nor an engineer, but I care a lot about the experience that people have when they're applying for a job. So that's me. I live in Australia, in Melbourne. I'm currently in day one of 14 days, quarantine. Yeah, I know, not fun. And I'm a mom of three kids as well.
Joel (2m 6s):
The wrong person, because you're a woman. We may have to get into that Chad and the Q and A, but until then, tell her, tell her what she's won.
Chad (2m 14s):
Well, Barb, you will have two minutes to pitch Predictive Hire. At the end of two minutes, you will hear the bell then Joel and I will hit you up with rapid fire Q and A and if your answers are starting to ramble or do you just get plain boring, Joel is going to hit you with the crickets. That's the signal to tighten up your game at the end of Q and A, you will receive one of these three grades from both Joel and myself. Big applause. Pile that shrimp up on the bar-bee and open some champagne because you have a winner. Oh,
Joel (2m 49s):
Open the Fosters baby, open the Fosters.
Chad (2m 52s):
Oh, that's golf club golf clap. Lay off all that shrimp pop a Fosters and get your ass off to work. The firing squad. That's not a knife. Seriously. Get back to the whiteboard. This isn't working.
Joel (3m 7s):
Gonna need a bigger boat. Barb are you ready to pitch the Firing Squad?
Barb (3m 10s):
Yeah. I just want a bit of what you guys have to raw me out, share it later.
Joel (3m 16s):
Listeners should know it's about six in the morning for Barb. So this is a little bit much for her, but she's a trooper and she's going to handle it. You have two minutes to pitch Barb. Are you ready?
Barb (3m 26s):
I'm ready.
Joel (3m 27s):
In three, two.
Barb (3m 30s):
Imagine for a moment that you're a store manager of a large national retail chain. You have 500 open positions. You get about 8,000 applicants a day, and you'd love to interview every one of them because you know that the people you hire, are your brand. So you sit down and you interview all of them. You let them share their story of who they are in their voice. You give them about 20 to 25 minutes and it feels really friendly and familiar cause it's just a chat and you don't go to them. You know, unlike recruitment you give every one of them personalized learning, which makes him feel amazing. It makes him feel heard, dignified and smarter because you're going to let down about 7,500, right?
Barb (4m 11s):
If you do the math, because you can only hire a few and you care a lot about the experience that everyone has, because they're all customers in your store. That's what we do, we make that possible. Where conversational AI, that's built for humans and backed by science. We call it Phai, PHAI. Predictive high AI. It understands you, it doesn't rush you. You don't need to do your hair and makeup for PHAI and PHAI is also blind. Doesn't know your race, age, or gender agenda. So it means that when you bring in those 500 people, they really truly represent the diversity of the community that you serve. That's pretty powerful.
Joel (4m 49s):
And where can they find out more Barb?
Barb (4m 51s):
Go to predictivehire.com.
Joel (4m 54s):
We'll end that right there. Okay. I'm going to start the questioning Barb. And I usually start with sort of a branding question usually revolving around your name, but your name makes a lot of sense to me. What's hard for me to get is the, the robot's name PHAI. So, so forgive, forgive the pun, but why PHAI.
Barb (5m 14s):
So part of what really has informed the whole product is the idea that everyone's given a fair go. You know, that's that mission. It's a great Aussi slogan. And that means that we don't really care that you're male or white or whatever your age is and we want it to have a chat bot with a name that was really, you know, neutral. It really gender agnostic. And actually our head data scientists came up with that. So that's how we came up with the name. We didn't want it to be a female like Alexa or Siri. Cause that just seemed too obvious. We wanted it to be something that represented us, but that also talked to our mission.
Joel (5m 48s):
So it's not a cute acronym or something. It's P H I or P H A I correct. That's right.
Chad (5m 54s):
Predictive Hire AI.
Joel (5m 56s):
Oh, it is an acronym. Okay.
Barb (5m 58s):
Part of what we're trying to do is be really authentic and honest and we don't pretend that it's a human. So when you give it a human name, you're kind of, we feel representing that this is something that it's not. You know, it is a robot, so to speak it is a machine, it is AI on the other end. And so we want to be honest about it and not give it a name that suggests it's a person.
Joel (6m 19s):
No job seeker confusion about PHAI. What is that? They get it, that it's the name of the robot.
Barb (6m 25s):
Some companies put their own name on it. You know, there are quite a few businesses now that really have built in chat as a vehicle to engage with their staff and they might have their own name. So they're welcome to apply that name, you know, part of our product is that the whole experience, right?
Joel (6m 41s):
Gotcha. Say no more Predictive Hire AI, P.H.A.I. Got it. Chad boom.
Chad (6m 46s):
There you go. I'd say it's a little later in the day for Joel. So he hasn't obviously taken his nap. So is this a high volume play, mainly?
Barb (6m 56s):
So it definitely is. You know, I think a couple of things that make it high volume, which is, you know, when you're bringing AI into your organization, it's a lot of change for the recruitment team for the organization. And so we find the bigger, the problem, you know, the easier it is for organizations to embrace it. So we tend to work with businesses recruiting at scale because they get the most payback, but you can use it in other roles as well. Because part of what the solution delivers is not just efficiency because we think it's much more important to also be really human. Is, you know, it just helps bring data and intelligence to every recruitment decisions. So whether you use it for engineers or for frontline retail staff, you know, it works in the same way.
Chad (7m 40s):
So when it comes down to a company actually buying into Predictive Hire, generally, what's their number one priority that you are filling right out of the gate?
Barb (7m 50s):
Absolutely recruitment efficiency. How do I get to the right talent fast? You know, you get to time to offer in less than 24 hours. And if you've got 500 open roles or any open roles now, because it's such a candidate first market, you got to move fast. So speed.
Chad (8m 6s):
Okay. So what about setup for that company? Because not everybody has the same questions. They don't have obviously the same assessment processes. I mean, do you come with canned assessments and canned questions that you just roll out automatically? Or is there usually a lead time? Weeks, months to be able to get it set up so that it can learn and then deploy?
Barb (8m 28s):
Yeah, no, look, it's actually a less than 24 hour set up, in theory. What we find though is usually there's an integration which might take a few weeks and the customer always wants to customize it. You know, they always want to bring in their voice. We're able to reflect their values and their culture in the questions. So there's usually a period of us collaborating with them to really amplify those aspects of the experience. But, you know, in theory, you can go live tomorrow.
Joel (8m 54s):
Talk about the job seeker interaction with, with P.H.AI. Is it, I go to the website and it's a little bubble in the bottom. Is it a text messaging as well? Is it like sort of mobile? Platform based? Does a recruiter send a link to a candidate and then they click it and then start the process of chatting? Is it, is it available on other messaging platforms? Like WhatsApp or others? Talk about that.
Barb (9m 21s):
Yeah. So it's simply a link that can get included in inserted in any sourcing channels so Snapchat, WhatsApp, et cetera. But usually what happens is we're working with really big companies who have a legacy system, like a Workday or a Success Factors. And so you apply for a job in the normal way, but pretty quickly you get to the point in that experience where it says, Hey, now we want to give you a first interview. We don't call it an assessment because it's like an interview. So everyone gets a chance at the job. And so they click on that and they start the conversation. And it's five questions, you know, that's really the key IP or an invention is that it's super quick. And within about 10 to 20 minutes of finishing, they get this feedback profile, which is really phenomenal in recruitment because, you know, there's a big difference between a normal chat bot that an engineer can code in a week versus conversational AI that's based on science where you really understand the person's real language.
Barb (10m 16s):
And we give that feedback back to the candidate. So it's pretty quick and simple, and it means no CVs, no phone screens. So from a recruiter perspective, it gives back just a huge amount of time to them.
Joel (10m 29s):
So let's talk about sort of global domination. Are you guys are based in Australia. Are you available in other countries? Which ones, if not, what countries are you hoping to grow into or are you just Australian or APAC company? Talk about the globe.
Barb (10m 49s):
Yeah. Yeah. So, round about, every 42 seconds to be precise someone around the world in one of 47 countries is having a chat with P.H.A.I. And our clients are global. Obviously we're, most of our team is based here, but we've also got a sizable team in the UK. We've got a team in the Philippines and some people in China as well. And you know, the one we obviously want to pursue global domination, you know, going into the US, is incredibly exciting for us. We've just got one client there at the moment, and we're looking to expand that, but the only constraint to our tech is it's English only, you know, AI is pretty sophisticated.
Barb (11m 29s):
You can't slap on Google translate and then, you know, provide the service. So we'll be in Spanish and French and Italian and German late next year. But for now we're in any English countries, English speaking countries.
Joel (11m 42s):
Gotch ya. Gotch ya. So in America, there's a lot of a lot of chatbots. It's very competitive. What's your differentiator?
Barb (11m 48s):
So, you know, I think the market is really confused about chat bot versus conversational AI. And, you know, the difference simply I say is, it's the difference between 2d and 3d, you know, a chat bot. If you engage with most of the chat bots out there, in fact, all of them, they don't give you anything back. You know, they're really just automating a process and it's very transactional. They're pretty crude and simplistic. They use keyword matching. They're not based on any kind of science, like natural language processing, which is what we have. So to be truthful, the only other technology that's similar to ours, but it's not really applied in this space is IBM Watson. Which was built through understanding people through language and then predicting whether or not they had a certain set of traits to be successful in a role.
Barb (12m 36s):
And so right now we're the only one that has something similar. It was built in a really different way. And so that's fundamentally the difference. It's truly a science-based experience. And you know, it's also very much a machine learning product and maybe I'll stop there and see what questions you ask. But I think there's also a fair bit of confusion around AI and a lot of puffery around AI versus something that's truly a learning technology.
Chad (13m 1s):
You said something earlier that I want to dive into, you said, it's really an interview it's not an assessment. Well, I mean, the assessments overall, personality assessments or what have you, they are different than an interview because of obviously the algorithm that tests, it goes against that. So is it an interview or is it an assessment? like a personality assessment?
Barb (13m 24s):
Yeah, look, it's designed as an interview. It simulates the best in class of what a good interview looks like, which is it's a structured set of questions where people are measured against a performance rubric. What we're discovering through the language is soft skills and communication skills and features like your propensity to be a job hopper, which is a kind of a formal term in IO world. And, you know, my view is it's exactly the same as an interview when you're interviewing me, you're assessing and judging me, you're listening to my responses to see whether I'm really driven, whether I'm really resilient, whatever it is that you're looking for. But you know, the problem is that you bring all of your biases, right?
Barb (14m 5s):
Like we're all imbued with biases and that's where a machine that's blind can really discover you know, what I would say is undiscovered talent. And that's the beauty of using technology to do your interviews for you.
Chad (14m 18s):
Okay. So a job hopper, let's say 2, 3, 4 years ago, that would have been a problem, but that's standard for today, right? So how does a company actually keep, like yours, actually keep up with changes in the market because you're actually using past behavior. And as we just saw over the last year, well, there's little the same than it was a year plus ago, 18 months ago. Right. So how does an algorithm that is trained on past behavior keep up with the world of today?
Barb (14m 51s):
Because it's not, it's not based on historical data. That is a key difference between us and every other AI solution. You know, if you're using, I won't mention any names, a lot of other AI solutions, they survey your employee group, you know, the whole Amazon story, which I'm sure you're familiar with, where you're using CVs from people that were hired. We don't use historical data to define the profile. What we have that's really unique to us is this incredible data set of words. It's about 300 million words. Now it's doubling every six months. And the signs of being able to discover your profile, as in your personality, your communication fluency from words comes from that data set. It does not come from tracking whether or not you were hired and whether or not you were successful in the job.
Barb (15m 36s):
That's how we start. And we start with, they're called rule-based models. As we get data from your company about who was hired and who left in any other truly objective performance data, we do retrain our models pretty much like the whole Netflix, you know, Amazon experience, but we don't start with a bias dataset. We don't start with historical data. And that's a really key point of difference in terms of minimizing bias and avoiding all those issues that you mentioned.
Chad (16m 5s):
But you're using an algorithm to score and really predict whether an individual is going to do well in that position or not.
Barb (16m 14s):
Yeah. But you, as the company, you get to set the profile.
Chad (16m 16s):
Right? Yeah. I totally get that. But me as a company, I'm biased because I'm a human being, right. So that all in itself is like, we're actually training bias into the system. And I know that computers are blind, but in most cases they have problems with different cohorts, like individuals with disabilities, right. Because they don't test the same. They don't think the same. So how do you deal with something like that?
Barb (16m 41s):
You have to, you know, start with the assumption that when you're talking with a client and they say, look, we want people who are, you know, highly driven, high humility, we want them to have a growth mindset that, you know, that's not a biased formula. It would be pretty malevolent for a company to come and say, we want this profile, you know, we want assholes, who don't care about people and don't work well with teams. It just doesn't happen like that.
Chad (17m 5s):
Have you worked with American companies yet Barb? I mean, seriously, those are profiles.
SFX (17m 14s):
Oh hell no.
Barb (17m 14s):
And then in terms of the, you know, does this work for a wide range of groups? Again, I'd say that's where we're really different. Which is the difference between you and I and a machine is that you can't figure out our biases, right? Because they're invisible and they're unconscious. But when you look at data, you can actually test against people who identify as neuro-diverse, you know, different ethnic groups, different genders. And so you're able to actually see whether there's bias and then retrain the model to minimize that bias. So one of the things that our product gives you is that you can see real time, whether there's any bias in the machine recommendations on race and gender, which is, you know, a transparency, right. And that's what clients want is they want to see transparently, what's really going on here.
Barb (17m 57s):
How can I trust this technology? So, you know, there are some things we've done in making available our science. We're the only company in this space to publish our science, because we think all science is falsifiable and you deserve to challenge it and take a look at it. You know, we're the only company that tests broadly against all different protected groups. So, it's a huge responsibility we have to do the right thing. And we're fully transparent on how tech performs and obviously the customer gets access to that real-time, as well, and the reporting.
Joel (18m 30s):
As a big fan of the show, Barb.
Barb (18m 33s):
Yeah, that's me! How did you know that?
Joel (18m 36s):
I know that you've listened to a lot of the news stories lately about chatbots getting acquired. Pretty almost all of them have been acquired. Now that's good news to some people, but I look at it as look, these companies got a lot of money, the next round of news should not be acquiring. And certainly not without terms disclosed, it should be about a new round of funding and these chatbots becoming huge businesses and sort of the next wave of hiring. Does that news discourage you? Do you see that and feel like, well, they got it wrong and we're going to get it right. How do you look at the news of all the acquisitions going on right now?
Barb (19m 16s):
Yeah. Look, I think that the interest in conversational AI and using that as a medium to connect with people and understand people, you know, candidates employees is incredibly encouraging because it's a very human, normal thing to do, you know. To put on hair and makeup and do a video interview or to play a game, to me is not a thing that I'm going to do every day, but having a chat or texting my mates and my family is really normal. And so I think that whole raft of acquisitions is a reflection of that's the future. And when you think about distributed work, you know, Salesforce buying Slack, Microsoft teams, et cetera, that's how employees connect as well. Right?
Barb (19m 56s):
You know, it's all about that asynchronous communication. So we have a vision to go way beyond recruitment as a chat interface to help employees really navigate the workplace, as well as what we're doing right now in recruitment.
Joel (20m 10s):
Just so you're expanding outside of recruitment. And it looks like according to Crunchbase, you guys have raised about $4.3 million.
Barb (20m 19s):
Is that US dollars? Yeah.
Chad (20m 22s):
US is 3.2
Joel (20m 24s):
Okay. So 3.2, is that number correct?
Barb (20m 26s):
It's a bit more than that. We're about to go and do a, a big round of funding. Well, when I say big, that's obviously my ambition in the second half of this year to really support our growth and it may and into the U S so yeah, looking forward to that, and we're only a team of 35 right now, but an incredibly committed team. So we're expecting to about double in size over the next year.
Joel (20m 47s):
We hope that we are on your PR list, when you announced that new round of funding.
Barb (20m 54s):
Absolutely.
Joel (20m 54s):
In addition to growing into the U S and maybe getting out of recruitment, what are some other things that we should be looking for in the future for Predictive Hire is video in the future, for example?
Barb (21m 5s):
Yeah. Look, we're not big fans of video because we feel like it, you know, there's a real risk of bias, in that. And we don't think the technology particularly the AI is at the point where you can comfortably say it's inclusive and not potentially biased against certain groups. So that's not where we're headed, where we're wanting to move is really around the onboarding space. So if you think about hiring at scale, you know, at our largest customer hires 40,000 people a year, right. And how do you make them all? And there are 15 years old to, you know, 70 years old, how do you help them navigate that workplace in a way where, you know, it really helps them understand what they need to do, how to have conversations.
Barb (21m 46s):
So that's kind of the space that we want to move into to have P.H.A.I as your own personalized coach. And, you know, we're looking at that in the education space as well for students. So we see the, you know, the chat and the understanding that the chat has about people as being really the core uniqueness to our take.
Chad (22m 7s):
Let's talk about integrations in a system, because obviously we don't want recruiters or hiring managers jumping from platform to platform, not to mention adoption is incredibly low when they have to get out of their core platforms. So what kind of integrations do you have and which ones do you have planned for the coming year?
Barb (22m 26s):
Yeah. Yeah. So look, we have an open API and we've done about 10 integrations so far. So into all the, at least the main ones that I know of, like Workday and Success Factors, Page Up and so on. So part of our funding is actually to accelerate that. It's a native experience within the system, and I completely agree it needs to all be seamless for the recruiter to make it really frictionless for them. So as we get our funding, we'll just start to integrate with all the main players. And we do all the work for the clients so it's only a couple of hours on their side that we need from them, mostly around designing the user journey for the candidate to make sure that that's really truncated and really simple, but the technical integration, our team does, we call them our team of integration warriors, they're pretty amazing.
Barb (23m 10s):
It's about four weeks for us to do an integration.
Joel (23m 14s):
What kind of a CEO are you, Barb? Are you a visionary? Are you a product person? Are you sort of the face of the company and the hustler? Where would you categorize yourself as a CEO?
Barb (23m 25s):
That's a great question. Look, I think I have to play that all of those roles, to be honest in different times, you know, I have a very strong product vision, you know, I don't come as I said, from the technical background and, you know, the combination of myself and Buddhi, my co-founder who was the principal data scientist at Culture Amp is. You know, I'm the sort of human of how do we make sure that the experience for people is really human and really Canada first, I think there's a lot of Turkey talk about Canada first, but there's a lot of bullshit about that as well. And, you know, we really put that first before the technology. So, you know, it has to work. There has to be science, but fundamentally people need to trust it and I, I guess I'm the visionary around, how do we bring that to life?
Chad (24m 12s):
Nice. Nice. So you, you don't have a large staff, which is great. I mean, you're lean and mean, how are you guys hitting the market? How are you actually getting into business development? Partnerships? How are you getting that revenue up? What's your primary focus?
Barb (24m 29s):
Yeah. So look, we have a sales team who are awesome. And, you know, to be honest, a lot of our leads come from our customers. So some of our customers like, you know, Quantis is a fantastic business in Ireland called Woody's. That's just referring us to most of the Irish market and, you know, they are generating most of our leads, which is fantastic. So that's one way in which we go to market. The other is, we work with all the big RPO. So Ranstad globally is a big strategic partner of ours. All of the RPOs we're in discussion with, and, you know, they desperately need to bring technology into their stack, which is not just about solving efficiency for them, but also addressing the inclusion challenge.
Barb (25m 10s):
You know, I think organizations are desperate now for something to really fix bias and fix diversity. So we're seeing a lot of interest from the RPOs in using our technology. So those are the two ways in which we go to market direct and by RPO channel,
Joel (25m 26s):
All this stuff sounds really, really expensive Barb. What can I expect to pay for Predictive Hire?
Barb (25m 33s):
Yeah. So that's a great question. You know, look in terms of a range it's we typically price based on hires. Cause we think that's the metric that really matters. And we want as many candidates to go through this and experience it as possible because it's such an amazing experience. So depending on the scale of business and how many different countries were helping you with, you're probably paying anywhere from 20 bucks, a hire to a few hundred dollars a hire. So that's broadly the range for our pricing. We also have, I think that's something quite unique to us, we have a change management team because a big part of this is the, how do you bring the team along, right. And how do you get your recruiters to trust this?
Barb (26m 14s):
How do we build AI literacy internally? So we put a lot of effort into that change support, and all of that gets included in that incredibly cost-effective pricing that I've just shared.
Joel (26m 25s):
Well, thank you for the transparency, because most of the startups we interview are a little bit dancy around the pricing. So we thank you for that. And holy cow, it's the bell. Barb, are you ready to face the firing squad?
Barb (26m 42s):
I'm, yeah. I'm crossing my hands, my fingers and toes waiting. Yeah, go for it.
Joel (26m 48s):
Chad have at it.
Chad (26m 51s):
Okay. Barb. I'd like you to know, I don't believe in magic, fortune tellers or predictive technology, but I do believe in anti ghosting magic, your ability to scale, efficiency. I believe in giving recruiters and hiring managers, time back and cutting out all of the bullshit tasks and support and superfluous processes out of their day. I love ease of use for candidates and also for recruiters and staff. And I believe hitting the RPOs is just smart as you can get, which means I do believe in Predictive Hire.
Chad (27m 36s):
That's a big one applause for me!
Barb (27m 40s):
Wow. Thank you.
Joel (27m 42s):
Don't get too excited. It's my turn. It's my turn now. Look, we've had a lot of chatbots on this show, excuse me, conversational AI solutions on this show. And I don't think that I have given any of them, anything other than a big applause. This might be the first or it might not. I love everything you said. I am, to me, it's a mystery that a lot of these chat bots are being acquired for, I guess, a cheap price because they're not announcing the acquisition costs, but I think a lot of it is maybe people were early into the game. Maybe the tech wasn't right. Maybe I think the founders didn't quite get the market.
Joel (28m 24s):
I think that you're probably coming in at a really great time. I like the science. I love the PhD's on your team that you have listed. The one thing that I would, that I'm a little concerned about is the getting out of, getting into different segments of chatting. I think that if you have an eye faced toward America, you're going to have more than enough work ahead of you to get things right on the recruitment side, that getting a little bit distracted, maybe by onboarding or enterprise teams, whatever marketing, I don't know exactly what is in store, but I would, I would caution you against getting unfocused in terms of recruitment and the employment side.
Joel (29m 14s):
But I think that you're probably smart enough to focus. I love the fact that you're going to be announcing a new round of funding soon. I think you need to build up that team, build up that marketing and sales to tackle America and the rest of the world. I'm rooting for you. I think you can do it big applause for me.
Chad (29m 33s):
Holy cow! Put the shrimp on the bar-bee. Pop the corks baby. It's time.
Joel (29m 37s):
How do you feel Barb?
Barb (29m 38s):
Wow. I just was waiting for my moment. Thank you so much!
Joel (29m 42s):
What better way to start your day in Australia at six am?
Barb (29m 50s):
You sound like my board, that's very astute advice. Really appreciate it. Thank you. Very grateful.
Joel (29m 56s):
Great. Congratulations to you and keep us in the loop while you Barb. Chad Another firing squad in the books.
Joel and Chad (30m 5s):
We out.
Firing Squad OUTRO (30m 13s):
This has been the Firing Squad. Be sure to subscribe to the Chad and Cheese Podcast so you don't miss an episode. And if you're a startup who wants to face the Firing Squad, contact the boys at chadcheese.com today. That's www.chadcheese.com.
Comments